<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.sportsbubbler.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Did they underperform?</title><link>http://community.sportsbubbler.com/blogs/between_the_green_pillars/archive/2008/10/07/did-they-underperform.aspx</link><description>In a season of ups and downs, the offense caught the most flack for under performing. It was expected that Prince Fielder would again hit 50 home runs and Ryan Braun would be right there with him now that he was getting a full season to show what he could</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 (Debug Build: 20423.869)</generator><item><title>re: Did they underperform?</title><link>http://community.sportsbubbler.com/blogs/between_the_green_pillars/archive/2008/10/07/did-they-underperform.aspx#570022</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:03:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">710e9f71-a715-4db8-b7a1-5cdd760ce611:570022</guid><dc:creator>radio silence</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. That was an excellent read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.sportsbubbler.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=570022" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>