Five notes from the loss to Minnesota

I couldn't be happier to have "Favre-ageddon" over with. This game has been circled on my calendar ever since Brett Favre showed up at the Vikings' training camp this summer. And, as in the two teams' first meeting, No. 4 was perfect in every facet and rubbed the victory right in the face of Ted Thompson. It was definitely a painful loss, but it just shows how good Favre actually makes the Vikings. While Aaron Rodgers still had a great game statistically, there is still a mountain of work to be done to set the Packers aside and into the playoffs.

1. The first half made me dry heave. Not only did the stats prove it as well, but that was the worst freaking half of football I have ever seen the Green Bay Packers play in my 20-or-so years of watching the team. Favre effortlessly moved his team down the field against a defense that looked unstoppable the last two weeks, albeit against infereior opponents. And when the Packers did have the ball, the running game proved worthless and Aaron Rodgers looked as though he'd never taken a snap before. The offensive line was a sieve just like last time. Everything that could have gone wrong did, and it really set the team back both on the scoreboard and in the minds of the players.

2. Favre is better than the Packers defense. I really don't think the defense played all that bad. I just think that the Vikings played that well. In the second half when the Packers took the momentum from the Vikings, Favre took the Vikings down and got a key third-down touchdown late in the game to make it a two-possession affair. Everything the Packers threw at them the Vikings batted it away. That's a damn good team over there.

3. Johnny Jolly's an idiot. Thanks to Brian for getting Jolly's quote after the game. After fist pumping a great third down stop, I immediately cussed out Jolly's insanely moronic penalty. What goes through a player's head when doing something like that? It was absolutely crucial to get momentum at the start of the game, and the defense had it for a split second. Mike McCarthy, for some reason, doesn't see the importance in keeping the penalties to the minimum. He needs to hold himself more responsible for those errors.

4. Should I order my Spencer Havner jersey yet? How sweet was his diving touchdown catch yesterday? I'm very impressed with the way Havner's come on after scoring his first touchdown last week in Cleveland. But two touchdowns in the biggest game of the year? That's just awesome. Not to mention his special teams ability, but Havner's been awesome, and one of the lone bright spots from yesterday.

5. Greg Jennings HAS to keep it up. It was really nice to see Jennings get back on track with a solid game. When he scored his touchdown, his first since opening night, he looked incredibly relieved. Rodgers needs to find Jennings more, and he knows it. He's an amazing receiver with one of the best quarterbacks in the league, which leads me to believe he'll be fine.

 Of course there are plenty more points to discuss so let's attack that in the comments section below.

Comments

 

Twitter Trackbacks for Five notes from the loss to Minnesota - Railbird Central [sportsbubbler.com] on Topsy.com said:

Pingback from  Twitter Trackbacks for                 Five notes from the loss to Minnesota - Railbird Central         [sportsbubbler.com]        on Topsy.com

November 2, 2009 8:12 AM
 

madman said:

Roster, roster, roster. We cannot go on forever being the youngest team in the league, and always  being just a couple of years away. TT needs to open the wallet and solidify the O-line in the off-season. He can then draft a few playmakers for each side of the ball. TT needs to step up next off-season and make the team better.

Coaching, coaching, coaching. If your team is properly prepared with a smart game plan, you should not come out so flat. The running game did not work in the first half because this is a team that has to pass to set up the run. I think that the fact that they run better in the 4th Q, even when it is expected, is a credit to the conditioning coach. But they generally can't run in the first three quarters of the game. The coaching staff needs to recognize that fact and game plan around it. They can't game plan for the team they think they SHOULD be. Then there are the in- game adjustments and penalties. MM needs to step up now and prove that he can make the team better.

All that said, this is a team that could still make the playoffs. I even seem to remember one year (2004)when the Pack beat the Vikings twice in the regular season. The Vikings came to Lambeau and some guy with the initials BF threw four interceptions, losing in the first round of the playoffs to what everyone viewed as an "inferior" 8-8 Vikings team. Stuff happens.

November 2, 2009 8:46 AM
 

Erik said:

I think you are so right to place a lot of the blame for yesterday's loss on the defense.  Rodgers did look, in the first half, like he was on a stage that was way to big for him.  But in the second half he did what any superstar in this league does: his great play makes up for the lack of talent around him, namely the o-line and the running game.  

But the defense was flat all night.  That second touchdown drive for the Vikes was downright painful, it felt as if the Packers D just resigned themselves to "get it over with" or something.  And then they continued to be shredded for 38 points.  Few teams in this league will win if their opponents put up 38 points.

November 2, 2009 9:32 AM
 

Pack66 said:

TT opened his wallet once....and a moth flew out!

November 2, 2009 9:53 AM
 

whw said:

I bet that if you began fining the coack for those penalties, they'd stop immediately.

November 2, 2009 12:53 PM
 

Asshalo said:

I after the third touchdown I actuallyu said, "I think I'm gona dry heave."

2. I disagree, simply because he was able to move the ball with a big play whenever the vikings really needed it. It should never be that easy for any NFL QB and other opponents of the Vikes have shown that

4. Without Jolly's penalty the score is 20-21 in the third quarter. Not that we did anything with 24-20, but it would have put more preasure on the Vikes.

November 2, 2009 1:55 PM
 

RVLambo said:

Total and utter lack of respect for the sanctity of the offensive line is biting Ted Thompson right in his neatly pressed sansabelt slack covered former out-of the-action defensive back ass.

And his smarmy little game of Brett Favre/Minnesota keep-away has blown up in his face, too.  The Vikings wanted Favre almost as badly as Ted wanted him to go away, and I can't help but wonder if Green Bay could have gotten the pick that turned into Percy "Cheech" Harvin, had Thompson had the courage of his convictions last year, and sold Favre to the highest bidder.  He was arguably right to keep Rodgers over Favre, but at very least, we could have received a pick that could have been used on someone to keep the new QB from becoming a game-time tackling dummy.

November 2, 2009 5:03 PM
 

madman said:

RVLambo - By logic, I think you're right. But wouldn't trading Farve to the Vikings have been pretty much like the Sox trading Babe Ruth to the Yankees? You just don't do it. You don't hand your biggest rival a Hall of Fame player. But yeah, a quality, upper-1st round LT is very much needed. And no Harvin (and no Jolly) and maybe the Packers win that game.

November 3, 2009 9:17 AM

Leave a Comment

(required )  
(optional )
(required )  
Add

About This Blog

This is the place for those of you who can't get enough Green Bay Packers news! Updates will be provided frequently from the view of a "railbird." We go to the practices and scan the local media so you don't have to.

Milwaukee Magazine says, "Insightful and newsy, Brian Carriveau’s work could be mistaken for beat reporting instead of blogging. His coverage of the team’s practices is virtually unprecedented."

For comments, questions and media inquiries, please e-mail carriveau@uwalumni.com

Recent Posts

Advertisement

Packers Daily Links

Syndication