<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.sportsbubbler.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Packers become deeper at linebacker</title><link>http://community.sportsbubbler.com/blogs/railbird_central/archive/2008/08/27/packers-become-deeper-at-linebacker.aspx</link><description>One of the deepest positions on the Green Bay Packers roster is at linebacker, which is in stark contrast to last season. The opposite effect has happened along the defensive line where that is now a much thinner position, also a major difference from</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 (Debug Build: 20423.869)</generator><item><title>A $7.27 Million Dollar Question | Cheesehead TV</title><link>http://community.sportsbubbler.com/blogs/railbird_central/archive/2008/08/27/packers-become-deeper-at-linebacker.aspx#450743</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:59:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">710e9f71-a715-4db8-b7a1-5cdd760ce611:450743</guid><dc:creator>A $7.27 Million Dollar Question | Cheesehead TV</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;A $7.27 Million Dollar Question | Cheesehead TV&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.sportsbubbler.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=450743" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>