SportsBubbler.com



Arenas' Jefferson-Milwaukee trashtalk disappears from Agent Zero blog at NBA.com

Gilbert Arenas posing as writerHow gutless are Gilbert Arenas and the online gatekeepers of NBA.com, where the Washington Wizards' $111-million-guard is the featured NBA blogger? Arenas' schoolyard taunt at Richard Jefferson and Milwaukee is nowhere to be found on his Agent Zero: the blogfile.

Arenas has made a little noise lately about retiring his blog, blaming "technical difficulties" with the media in America, but a globetrotting trip to China, Europe and beyond prompted a lengthy July 13 entry about his travels. Along the way he added some thoughts on summer NBA player transactions and had this to say about the trade that brought Richard Jefferson to Milwaukee:

"HAHAHA. Oh, man, now that is funny. When I heard that, I started laughing. Oh man, did I start laughing. You know why? Because every player hates Milwaukee. Nobody wants to live in Milwaukee. I'm sorry, Milwaukee, to come down hard on you, but no one in the NBA wants to play in Milwaukee. From him going from New Jersey (actually New York, because he lives in New York), from New York to Milwaukee is like going ... let's just say it's not going to sit well with you. That was a funny one when I heard that one. I know Yi is happy though."

Hit delete - that paragraph is now gone from Arenas' blog, no doubt disappeared into the nether of some NBA.com flak's hard drive.

But not before Bucks fans reacted with all sorts of discussion about diversity, quality of life, segregation, economic opportunity, crime rates, the state's horrible black incarceration rates, Milwaukee's black brain drain (Atlanta came up), jobs, things to do, night life, Julius Erving's refusal to play in Milwaukee after being drafted by the Bucks in the 1970's -- yes, Bucks fans delved into it all for couple of days on Realgm.com (I admit responsibility for some of it). And trashtalked Arenas, of course, while also noting that the Bucks organization hasn't been all that attractive to players in the last five or six years. Bucks fans had a lot to say about Milwaukee, the good, the bad, the beautiful and the ugly.

Mostly lost in the wide-ranging discussion was that the target of Agent Zero's dis' wasn't Milwaukee so much as it was Jefferson, his former U. of Arizona Wildcats teammate and an increasingly unfriendly rival. (Badger fans will remember those two in passing from the 2000 NCAA West Regionals, as Wisconsin went on its way to a fourth date with the Flintstones in the Final Four.)

Last summer Jefferson and Arenas sparred in the media over a $3.5 million donation Jefferson made to build a new gym at AU. Then it got a little ugly, again on Arenas' nba.com blog. If Arenas was joking in any of this, nobody's getting it. And now Agent Zero is pretending his latest never happened, save for the reader comments responding to smacktalk that is no longer there.

Arenas and NBA.com ought to put Arenas' statements back up. He thought them; he wrote them; NBA.com has (or had) given him the license to post them. Arenas and the publishers of the website -- the league -- should either let the statements stand and if they feel damage control is in order, reframe, respin, whatever the urge is, in a new post. It's disrespectful to readers of his blog to simply "disappear" it all.

Yes, the NBA is a business, and, yes, it is entirely possible that the Bucks, part of NBA.com, demanded the removal of the Arenas' comments. But the NBA and Agent Zero are in the business of developing online editorial content for fans. The honest and ethical thing to do is to stand by the content and serve the readers and NBA fans, not the interest of the business or Arenas' image, foot-in-the-mouth though it's been since beginning his blog two years ago. 

The cat's long out of the bag and prowling all over cyperspace, linked at Dimemag.com, Ballhype.com, JSOnline.com, hundreds of sites in between, and now the mighty Bob Boozer Jinx. Axing the comments and pretending Agent Zero never wrote them doesn't serve Arenas or the NBA -- it just makes both look bad and wastes many an NBA fan's time.

"Technical difficulties with our media," Gilbert? A Dikembe Mutombo finger to that. It's hit it or quit it time.

Comments

 

Stevex4 said:

Agreed whole heartedly!! Arenas said what he said and it should remain on line for fans to read....

Thanks for includig the quote. I now I'm keeping that one....Incentive to spring for tickets when te Wizards are in town to BOOOOO!

I'm new to your blog as in this is my first visit so please bare with me if you have recently covered this topic......I have the impression hat the Bucks have a weel balanced team with specialized skills capable of generating good team chemistry......but we lack a true point guard in the sense of pass first-shoot second. There seems to be far too much confusion as to who should do what causing Redd to play outside his realm and leave Bogut calling for the ball and not getting it.

Bogut has hands....incredible hands....two hands... and both of them are scoring threats....

Why didn't we draft a point guard in the draft? I realize that Mo is our man. I think we signed him to a fat contract.....but, I was hoping Skiles would have dropped a hammer down and demanded a true PG as a means to organize the offense...court balance and rhythm allowing defense to be the focus.

sad to see DJ Augustine be right there at #8 and we let him slip by.....Damn!..

July 29, 2008 8:17 AM
 

J.D. Mo said:

For weeks a lot of national mock drafts had the Bucks taking Augustin, too, but the Bucks were never all that high on the guards in the draft after Rose and maybe Mayo. I agree, the Bucks need better point play and Mo has trouble running offense for anyone but himself, but I don't think Hammond or Skiles wanted the team in the hands of a rookie point guard. Ramon Sessions, after starting the last 13 games last season and getting a year of development is a much better bet than a rookie. The Bob Boozer Jinx was out ahead of this news back in May.

community.sportsbubbler.com/.../sessions-and-peterson.aspx

Now they've signed a veteran, Lue. Charlie Bell can play some point, and some D. But it still gets back to Sessions. If the Bucks are going to develop a point guard, why not keep working with Ramon rather than give up on him and bring somebody new in? Ramon's done next to nothing to disappoint so far.

What a great coaching staff to have for a point guard, btw  -  Skiles, Boylan, Hollins and Peterson, who was Nash's development coach in Dallas.

July 30, 2008 12:48 AM
 

Stevex4 said:

Wow....I didn't know about Peterson being Nash's development coach. Very encouraging and far sighted by the Bucks.

Do you think the Bucks hope Sessions develops into a point guard deserving of 35 plus minutes per game? If this is the M.O., then why did we sign Mo to a long tem contract? Of course, there is no gurantee Sessions continues to to develop at a rapid pace.

Either way, it seems like an intelligent back up and plan B if Mo fails to apply whatever Skiles teaches...

And it sure beats flexing their wallet for players like Bobby Simmons who.....ahh.....there was no place for him in Milwaukee.

Two more quick questions...Do you think the Bucks were too quick giving up on Steve Blake.....I think that guy was sort of platooning out in Portland last year, but he has a total point guard make-up.

And finally, will the Bucks look to trade their first round pick? If not, where does he fit in with Redd and I assume Villanueva filling out the forward positions....Of course, with Yi gone, we need some depth down low....

July 30, 2008 9:16 AM
 

J.D. Mo said:

I think they are looking at Sessions to play a lot. Boylan and Skiles observe ball movement like religion, and Mo hasn't been a ball movement guy. The previous regime (Slickless Larry Harris) was cornered into handing out some big contracts. I think with Mo there was a sense even in the Harris/Krystkowiak regime that a pass-first point guard was needed. I would expect Sessions to battle Mo for the starter's job. I'm sure Skiles is looking forward to that.

Steve Blake? Absolutely the Bucks gave up on him. They trade the guy to Denver for Earl Boynkins and a few months later draft a point guard? What was Harris thinking? Blake was set to become an unrestricted free agent in the offseason and Harris didn't want to deal with both Blake and Mo -so he gave it all to Mo. It's not difficult to see why Harris got fired.

I'm not sure where Alexander fits in and have been meditating on this point for some time now. I don't see a market for him but I think other trades are brewing.

July 30, 2008 10:51 PM

About J.D. Mo

J.D. Mo is the perpetrator of The Bob Boozer Jinx, your sportsbubbler.com Milwaukee Bucks blog.

About This Blog

I'm J.D. Mo, and welcome to my Bucks blog. I've been a Bucks junkie since 1977 when Nellie drafted Marques and the team was Green and Growing -- until a bizarre lawnmowing accident robbed it of its power forward, Dave Meyers. I knew then that truths stranger than fiction can happen to the Milwaukee Bucks, and probably will. This view rifles through much of what you'll find on the BBJ, along with commentary on Bucks news, fun NBA research and other interesting stuff from the Bucks-i-verse ... as well a cast of characters from around the NBA to liven things up around here, and, above all, keep the rock moving.
Advertisement

Syndication