Secondary Averages

Here's a little something to rethink the Crew's offense -- a secondary average measures aspects of the game that are not covered by the primary hitting average, or batting average (H/AB). Secondary average combines power (TB-H), speed (SB, CS), and patience/discipline (BB) into one average (TB-H+BB+SB-CS)/AB.

This is a little something to read next to AVG, OBP, etc., stats, and another way of measuring the productivity of the Brewers' offense in 2008:

Branyan: (77-33+19+1-0)/132=          .485

Cameron: (212-108+54+17-5)/444 = .383

Fielder: (298-162+84+3-2)/588 =       .376

Braun: (338-174+42+14-4)/611 =       .354

Weeks: (189-111+66+19-5)/475 =      .333

Durham: (160-107+53+8-4)/370 =     .297

Hardy: (272-161+52+2-1)/569 =        .288

Counsell: (75-56+46+3-1)/248=         .270

Kapler: (114-69+13+3-1)/229=           .262

Hart: (281-164+27+23-7)/612 =         .261

Hall: (160-91+37+5-6)/404 =              .259

Kendall: (167-127+50+8-3)/516 =      .184

Branyan leads because of his raw power; Cameron is more intriguing because of his all-around game. Cam posted one of the best BB rates of anyone on the team, hit for great power, and stole some bases effectively. He is, in this sense, the ultimate "secondary" player -- keep this in mind when simply judging players by AVG. AVG does not capture other valuable aspects of the game, such as speed productivity, power, and patience.

Braun and Fielder are obviously strong secondary players due to their power, and Fielder's patience also helps. Braun's speed contributes, too.

Weeks is another strong secondary player, compared with his batting average -- he draws walks, steals bases, and hits for extra bases at a good clip.

From Durham and below, we're getting into the range of players that have more one-dimensional games (except for Hart, who has good power and speed, but whose patience takes away from his secondary average).

Kendall and Hall are the least-productive secondary players on the team. Hall due to a lack of patience and speed, Kendall due to a rather one-dimensional game based around AVG.

Just another measure to think about when analyzing the Brewers.

Comments

 

Einsteinhood said:

I think if you want to be as accurate as possible, a few tweaks would need to be made:

SB-CS doesn't really fully account for the negative impact of a CS. The numbers I've seen suggest that a runner needs to steal at close to a 70% clip to "break even" as it were.

Might I suggest: SB-(2.5*CS) in it's place?

Also, why use AB? You're including BB in your calculation, so I can't see any reason not to use PA in it's place.

Updated equation: (TB-H+BB+(SB-(2.5*CS))/PA

I'm still not sure if I'm in love with the idea of subtracting hits from TB. I get the point, but then you toss BB into the equation. BB are good, but a single is better and they are being removed from the equation.

Thoughts?

October 25, 2008 1:14 PM
 

radio silence said:

<p>Good points!</p>

<p>I lifted a variation of an equation found in James' New Abstract. I hadn't heard of it before I read that book, and I thought it was a good idea. I'd also be inclined to add HBP, as well, which is a great secondary measure. </p>

October 25, 2008 6:47 PM

Leave a Comment

(required )  
(optional )
(required )  
Add

About This Blog

I'm Nicholas Zettel, and I've got the Junkball Blues. All I need for a cure is a sinkerball pitcher here, a curveball specialist there, and a bunch of guys with fastballs that top out in the high-80s. And those days when the knuckleball wasn't a speciality pitch, and pitchers simply kept one in their back pocket? That's what I'm talking about!

I write for Sportsbubbler.com, and this is the research I compile along the way. I love power-speed combo players, garbage time relievers, and the walking medicine cabinets that played baseball in the 1960s and 1970s, and got away with it.

Recent Posts

Advertisement

Syndication