I'm watching national analysts tear apart Selig -- it seems like one
supports Selig for every five that second guess him -- and it's
occurred to me: why is this such a huge issue?
First off, more baseball is never
a bad thing, and that's a fact -- the weather was bad in Philadelphia,
and that forces the first suspended game in the history of the World
Series (due to rain). That's way cool. Now we have an historical opportunity to watch the final 3 innings on a separate night, and the game will be finished.
Secondly,
for all the trouble Selig is getting for allowing the game to go into
the sixth inning, why isn't he getting more credit for an absolutely
correct judgment: that no World Series game will end this way, that he
would not have officially called the game after 4.5, even with the
Phillies leading, and that "this is no way to end a World Series."
Say
what you will about other Selig blunders, even the decision to let the
game go later, but I think Selig actually upheld the integrity of the
game by "skirting" the rules -- that is, I believe he got the spirit of
the game correct, even if he didn't completely go by the letter.
Third,
there are all sorts of issues with the type of information that Selig
was being fed, and he himself noted that he was working with the ground
crew during the 4th and after, and there's an extent to which he can
only go by the info he has. Couple that with the fact that the front
offices, umpires, and grounds crew all met with Selig before the game
and decided that the game would be played, and you have some context to
explain why the game went forward.
I think that people enjoy
second guessing Selig, and he's an easy target because a lot of people
believe that baseball is no longer the national pasttime, that baseball
is a flawed sport since the steroids disaster, etc. But I think people
need to separate their previous (and legitimate) criticisms of Selig
from this event...
...and frankly, do people even watch baseball
anymore? If we really tried, we could think of handfuls of games that
we've seen in the last few years that were continued in even worse
weather conditions than the conditions last night, and anyone
that watches baseball regularly will admit that they often see games
being rushed along through bad weather a couple of innings after there
was a logical stopping point. This is always something that
happens in baseball with bad weather, and I frankly think it is really
stupid to criticize Selig for this particular game.
And what
really escapes me is that all of this criticism and second guessing
occurs without one mention of how great the quality of play has been in
this series. We've seen late game comebacks, runners stranded and late
game comeback attempts stopped, and we've only had one blow-out thus
far through 4+ games.
We're in the midst of an incredibly exciting elimination game, and I don't understand why no one
is promoting the young stars, or patting baseball on the back for their
post-steroids brand of play, which seems to be faster, including more
young stars who combine power and speed, and some nice young pitchers
with excellent approaches and pretty good stuff.
I thoroughly
disagree with anyone that suggests that this weather debacle is just
another chapter in the demise of baseball -- I think this is clearly
the most exciting World Series since '03, and I think the national
media is more annoyed that their beloved Chicago, New York, Los
Angeles, and Boston teams are not in the Series than anything else...
Frankly,
with these young stars, I think the game is in better hands than it has
been in a very long time, and I am more excited to be a baseball fan
than ever before.
I just wish that people would see this series
for what it is -- a fine display of post-steroids baseball -- and
forget things that cannot be stopped (like Mother Nature....)