swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

ace_maverick:

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

Why dont you 2 asskissers get room and quit making us all sick.

ace_maverick:

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

Why dont you 2 asskissers get room and quit making us all sick.

Wouldn't you know it, Ace's go-to word is "us." (At least he rarely misspells it.) I won't speak for anyone else, but I will say I'm getting tired of Ace's self-appointed spokesman role. Who is comfortable siding with Ace? Anyone? Swany and Puddyellow have integrity. Ace can't even type the word. 

MuddyMask:

ace_maverick:

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

Why dont you 2 asskissers get room and quit making us all sick.

 

Wouldn't you know it, Ace's go-to word is "us." (At least he rarely misspells it.) I won't speak for anyone else, but I will say I'm getting tired of Ace's self-appointed spokesman role. Who is comfortable siding with Ace? Anyone? Swany and Puddyellow have integrity. Ace can't even type the word. 

LMAO!!!  Integrity Boy even has the nerve to say "us" when talking about the team, even though he stated in no uncertain terms that he has stopped supporting the team.  I even said in one thread "what's this "us" sh#t?" and like clockwork, he never bothered to respond or even acknowledge that it was even said. 

Still, that's his MO.  When confronted with facts, he recoils like a frightened turtle.

Judge Parins:

LMAO!!!  Integrity Boy even has the nerve to say "us" when talking about the team, even though he stated in no uncertain terms that he has stopped supporting the team.  I even said in one thread "what's this "us" sh#t?" and like clockwork, he never bothered to respond or even acknowledge that it was even said. 

Still, that's his MO.  When confronted with facts, he recoils like a frightened turtle.

Maybe he could change his name to Ace_Turtle. It has a better ring to it. Add a turtle avatar--maybe a picture of a turtle on its back--and he's in business. 

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

Well his credibilty was called out last week a few times and he couldn't defend himself but if calling him out gets you two back to fawning over yourselves who am I to stand in the way of your man crushes.

gbmickey:

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

Well his credibilty was called out last week a few times and he couldn't defend himself but if calling him out gets you two back to fawning over yourselves who am I to stand in the way of your man crushes.

I was "called" out by a grand total of one.  By the name of gbmickey.  That, sir, hardly qualifies as a "call out."  You thinking you were right does not make it so.  I'm thinking it will be awhile before someone backs you when (allegedly) calling me out.

And as far as "defending" oneself goes...calling people stupid or idiots is a common theme for you.  It is the last thing one does when they have nothing else.

I'm thinking if you're old enough, you probably have a couple of failed marriages in your past.  If not, there might be some on the way.  Congrats, Mr. Full of Himself.

 Yellow,

Why do you bother even addressing him.  I gave up a long time ago, he is nothing but a hairy little troll.  Stop feeding the troll. :)

gbmickey:

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

Well his credibilty was called out last week a few times and he couldn't defend himself but if calling him out gets you two back to fawning over yourselves who am I to stand in the way of your man crushes.

You're the only one that has ever questioned Puddy's credibility. He's been pretty fair in his assessment of the Packers. You on the other hand have no credibility on this board.

Pack Attack:

gbmickey:

puddyellow:

swany11:

gbmickey:

See how sad you are. You talk about proof and lies and asked about proof in which to back it up instead of putting words in my mouth you couldn't do it and now you lie about it. You have no credibility.

Puddy puts together some of the most well thought out posts on this board. He has as much credibility as anyone here.

 

Thank you, sir.  I can think of several posters that can debate well on both sides of the issue(s).  Occasionally, my mood dictates that I get nitpicky or trivial.  It's a weakness I have.  And contrary to what gb may believe, I will admit my errors.   I appreciate that generally my "credibility" has been viewed favorably. 

I can say the same for you Swany.

Well his credibilty was called out last week a few times and he couldn't defend himself but if calling him out gets you two back to fawning over yourselves who am I to stand in the way of your man crushes.

You're the only one that has ever questioned Puddy's credibility. He's been pretty fair in his assessment of the Packers. You on the other hand have no credibility on this board.

 

Thanks PA.  (check's in the mail....:)   )

Show me factually that I'm wrong and I'll admit it. If your wrong expect to be called out every time. Pud,if you want to make up crap or make assumptions expect to prove it.  Kind of like you used to do Cheezewhiz now you don't respsond to me too much which is good because you continually spouted crap that you admittantly no nothing about and get hammered for it. Man that must be tough on that fragile ego.

gbmickey:

Show me factually that I'm wrong and I'll admit it. If your wrong expect to be called out every time. Pud,if you want to make up crap or make assumptions expect to prove it.  Kind of like you used to do Cheezewhiz now you don't respsond to me too much which is good because you continually spouted crap that you admittantly no nothing about and get hammered for it. Man that must be tough on that fragile ego.

Look, gb, we've been around this block before.  You stated in this thread here (started by Cheezer) that was referring to rankings put out by ESPN which he supplied.  Several posters chime in followed by you.  Your first line reads, and I quote:

"We can agree this is crap Cheezer so why then do you use strength of schedule as a possible excuse why the Packers might not do as well? We all know how much it changes from year to year. Appears to me you talk out both sides of your mouth. This is just too funny!"

Never was strength of schedule mentioned ahead of you in the thread.  As I said, perhaps you were carrying over an argument from somewhere else.  But your line implies that you believe that rankings are "crap."  How else should one read it.  Please review....

http://community.sportsbubbler.com/forums/p/56788/469526.aspx#469526

Then a week ago, you begin a thread yourself pumping up rankings and how "far" the Packers have fallen, Please review...

http://community.sportsbubbler.com/forums/t/61391.aspx?PageIndex=1

Either your English or syntax is bad or you play both sides of the rankings argument to meet your needs.  I'll leave it to other posters to judge.  Feel free folks.  I'll take my lumps if you feel I deserve it.

Pud you hit the nail on the head. It had been an ongoing discussion that you made assumptions on and took out of context to try and prove a point. Well it backfired.

gbmickey:

Show me factually that I'm wrong and I'll admit it. If your wrong expect to be called out every time. Pud,if you want to make up crap or make assumptions expect to prove it.  Kind of like you used to do Cheezewhiz now you don't respsond to me too much which is good because you continually spouted crap that you admittantly no nothing about and get hammered for it. Man that must be tough on that fragile ego.

I give you about as much credence as the turd I just flushed in the bathroom.  I don't respond very often, because frankly you don't bring anything to the table but lies, spin, and half truths.  You have been trolling for a long time now, and I don't usually feed hairy trolls.

However since it is a free country and a public board, feel free to spout something about your BIG MENTAL PROWESS, or something along that lines.  IF you have to toot your own horn ALL the time, then it means that you really don't have anything to bring to the table but the horn.