quicksdraw:

gadz and the pick for brandon bass.

Considering he's a FA they would have to do a sign and trade to get him.

Their cap number is 68 mil after the season is done.  So their going to pay the lux on gadz salary for the 10th pick?

 

Just throwing it out there they could take Patty Mills at #10 give Bogey some Aussie company, they already know how eachother play from the Olympics and he is lightning quick. And then maybe get someone like Tyler H with our 2nd pick (he will be available, he will be that guy that drops all the way down, there is one every year)

AussieRay:

 

Just throwing it out there they could take Patty Mills at #10 give Bogey some Aussie company, they already know how eachother play from the Olympics and he is lightning quick. And then maybe get someone like Tyler H with our 2nd pick (he will be available, he will be that guy that drops all the way down, there is one every year)

Mills would be reaching a lot, it would be like taking Tyler at the 1.

I wouldn't have a problem with mills in the second round, but he won't be there

AussieRay:

 

Just throwing it out there they could take Patty Mills at #10 give Bogey some Aussie company, they already know how eachother play from the Olympics and he is lightning quick. And then maybe get someone like Tyler H with our 2nd pick (he will be available, he will be that guy that drops all the way down, there is one every year)

 

Good to see another aussie here!!

i think patty will go late first rd. it looks like NO or LA L will pick him up. 2nd rd if the bucks go small first there is another aussie in luke neville. played at utah same as bogut. not as complete as bogut but still handy big.

WiscoKing13:

ace_maverick:

BigDee:

Any chances the Bucks trade the pick?

Would be a good idea package pick with Gadz for whatever you can get. The Bucks cant not field a competitive team with sucking 6.7 millions dolloars. He will make 7.2 million the year after next. Since its about 50/50 gamble we pick someone who will make an impact, I say trade the pick and get Gadz the worst signing in the history of the NBA out of here.

HAHA LIKE ITS THAT EASY

No team can just take on 6.7 and 7.2 mil the next two years and if they could they wouldn't do it for the freaking 10th pick in the draft

No Duh simpleton. We would have t take back a player in the 9 million a year range or two players that = 9 million. However there are plenty of teams who want to move veterans with 1 or two years left on their deals. Some teams with more leverage can make better use of this pick. We need to get rid of dead weight (Gadz) or the next 2 seasons are doomed.

ace_maverick:

WiscoKing13:

ace_maverick:

BigDee:

Any chances the Bucks trade the pick?

Would be a good idea package pick with Gadz for whatever you can get. The Bucks cant not field a competitive team with sucking 6.7 millions dolloars. He will make 7.2 million the year after next. Since its about 50/50 gamble we pick someone who will make an impact, I say trade the pick and get Gadz the worst signing in the history of the NBA out of here.

HAHA LIKE ITS THAT EASY

No team can just take on 6.7 and 7.2 mil the next two years and if they could they wouldn't do it for the freaking 10th pick in the draft

No Duh simpleton. We would have t take back a player in the 9 million a year range or two players that = 9 million. However there are plenty of teams who want to move veterans with 1 or two years left on their deals. Some teams with more leverage can make better use of this pick. We need to get rid of dead weight (Gadz) or the next 2 seasons are doomed.

Why the hell would we add 2 mil in cap for one year less of gadz? and it would cost us the 10th pick, we all know most teams get built through the draft.  This team is not going anywhere beside the 6-8th seed in the playoffs the next two years. 

Then the player we get is going to be the same sh!tty player gadz is. Let gadz sit on the bench another year and wait for 2010 when he's going to be an expiring with the rest of the bunch

Since this team isn't going to be very good for a few years anyways, I'm hoping for Tyreke Evans. Can do a little bit of everything, and would immediately log minutes at both guard spots off the bench.

Heydveldt(sp?) from Gonzaga would be a solid 2nd rounder.

quicksdraw:

gadz and the pick for brandon bass.

Why do people actually think that Someone would want 2 years of Gadz contract in a trade.  He is ours for at least another year.

Analogkid:

quicksdraw:

gadz and the pick for brandon bass.

Why do people actually think that Someone would want 2 years of Gadz contract in a trade.  He is ours for at least another year.

why cant we try to trade him?   is that so bad? this is a disscussion board btw.   mr party pooper.

FunDmentals:

Since this team isn't going to be very good for a few years anyways, I'm hoping for Tyreke Evans. Can do a little bit of everything, and would immediately log minutes at both guard spots off the bench.

Heydveldt(sp?) from Gonzaga would be a solid 2nd rounder.

tell me why we are not going to be good next year please?

WiscoKing13:

ace_maverick:

WiscoKing13:

ace_maverick:

BigDee:

Any chances the Bucks trade the pick?

Would be a good idea package pick with Gadz for whatever you can get. The Bucks cant not field a competitive team with sucking 6.7 millions dolloars. He will make 7.2 million the year after next. Since its about 50/50 gamble we pick someone who will make an impact, I say trade the pick and get Gadz the worst signing in the history of the NBA out of here.

HAHA LIKE ITS THAT EASY

No team can just take on 6.7 and 7.2 mil the next two years and if they could they wouldn't do it for the freaking 10th pick in the draft

No Duh simpleton. We would have t take back a player in the 9 million a year range or two players that = 9 million. However there are plenty of teams who want to move veterans with 1 or two years left on their deals. Some teams with more leverage can make better use of this pick. We need to get rid of dead weight (Gadz) or the next 2 seasons are doomed.

Why the hell would we add 2 mil in cap for one year less of gadz? and it would cost us the 10th pick, we all know most teams get built through the draft.  This team is not going anywhere beside the 6-8th seed in the playoffs the next two years. 

Then the player we get is going to be the same sh!tty player gadz is. Let gadz sit on the bench another year and wait for 2010 when he's going to be an expiring with the rest of the bunch

We have to take 9 million or so in return becasue you have to count both Gadz contract as well as the minium rookie salary that the 10 pick would get paid. Can't beleive how dumb you are Wisco? Do we have to spell out everything? Wasting two more years with Gadz stting there is enough to make notmal Bucks fans puke. This team needs to sell tickets remember? If we continue down this path your calling for the Bucks will be playing Basketball in St. Louis or some other city looking for a Professional Basketball team. Any combination of players is better than Gadz in my opinion.

great post ace and yes you do have to spell it out for him and yes it is maddening.  welcome to my world.

ace_maverick:

WiscoKing13:

ace_maverick:

WiscoKing13:

ace_maverick:

BigDee:

Any chances the Bucks trade the pick?

Would be a good idea package pick with Gadz for whatever you can get. The Bucks cant not field a competitive team with sucking 6.7 millions dolloars. He will make 7.2 million the year after next. Since its about 50/50 gamble we pick someone who will make an impact, I say trade the pick and get Gadz the worst signing in the history of the NBA out of here.

HAHA LIKE ITS THAT EASY

No team can just take on 6.7 and 7.2 mil the next two years and if they could they wouldn't do it for the freaking 10th pick in the draft

No Duh simpleton. We would have t take back a player in the 9 million a year range or two players that = 9 million. However there are plenty of teams who want to move veterans with 1 or two years left on their deals. Some teams with more leverage can make better use of this pick. We need to get rid of dead weight (Gadz) or the next 2 seasons are doomed.

Why the hell would we add 2 mil in cap for one year less of gadz? and it would cost us the 10th pick, we all know most teams get built through the draft.  This team is not going anywhere beside the 6-8th seed in the playoffs the next two years. 

Then the player we get is going to be the same sh!tty player gadz is. Let gadz sit on the bench another year and wait for 2010 when he's going to be an expiring with the rest of the bunch

We have to take 9 million or so in return becasue you have to count both Gadz contract as well as the minium rookie salary that the 10 pick would get paid. Can't beleive how dumb you are Wisco? Do we have to spell out everything? Wasting two more years with Gadz stting there is enough to make notmal Bucks fans puke. This team needs to sell tickets remember? If we continue down this path your calling for the Bucks will be playing Basketball in St. Louis or some other city looking for a Professional Basketball team. Any combination of players is better than Gadz in my opinion.

YOU ARE A DUMBASS

The player you will get back is the SAME SH!T PLAYER GADZ IS, so your going to have to deal with that player for the entire year.

So your pawning off the 10th pick of the draft for one less year of gadz.

That would be idiotic

Here's the small deal that might you will probably see JH explore

Ridnour/10th or Joe

for

Late first or a early second round pick.

Teams that have cap and won't use it can eat ridnour contract for a year and gain a prospect in joe or the 10th pick.

Bucks clear cap, that seems to be the most resonable and the bucks don't lose much if anything

If you remember last year he explored the deal with NJ before the trade deadline but they turned it down, a team like Sac, Okl and others with cap might be able willing ot eat ridnours contract for the prospect.

Its just gong to be hard for some of these teams in a bad enconmy to almost buy joe or the 10th pick for 6.5 million + the prospects salary

jdn:

Carmichael17:

#1 (Because they resign Sessions  and let CV go) They Draft a PF-  When you look at the "top" prospects at the position they usually list -Griffin-Hill-and Johnson-as the top 3 (Griffin is obviously #1). I think one of the next two could be there, but I see Skiles and JH opting for Dejuan Blair instead. This is the pick I would like to see them make -I see a cross between Ben Wallace and Elton Brand. With Redd and Bogut back next year we don't need scoring-they need a banger next to Bogut. Hill and Johnson are more athletic and have the classic "potential" label, but they already went that direction with Joe last year. ESPN currently has Blair listed at #12 best player available for what that is worth. Another player who is a total Skiles type is Hansbrough. I know the so called "experts" in the media downgrade him and feel he is probably going to go 20-25, but I bet you he goes higher. They say he is not athletic enough,

As far as the Sessions or CV?-I don't think it is even close. CV had a nice contract year, but the guy just has a history of playing rather soft and half hearted too much of the time. If you could put more of a warriors mentality in him you would really have something, but I see him going back to more of a slacker mentality after the contract. Sessions is a high effort guy who I think is just going to get better.

  I agree I'd rather have Sessions of the two, but I think the Bucks would get a better PG at 10 than any PF that's left.  I like Blair, but I think he's a little short for that position.

I would rather have Conley from Memphis.