wisblue:

Juiceman:

wisblue:

You are wrong, wrong, wrong, on my age, and anyone who is a regular on this board knows it.

I guessed your age based on the way you respsond to debate.  Name calling is usually left for the immature and uneducated.

I hope for your sake that you are under 10, because usually people get over the "Ha,ha your team lost" phase at least by then. If you followed this board at all you would know that I don't resort to name calling as a normal response to debate. But, when dealing with certain people (such as trolls) it seems to be the only way to make a point.

oh really?

quicksdraw:

wisblue:

Juiceman:

wisblue:

You are wrong, wrong, wrong, on my age, and anyone who is a regular on this board knows it.

I guessed your age based on the way you respsond to debate.  Name calling is usually left for the immature and uneducated.

I hope for your sake that you are under 10, because usually people get over the "Ha,ha your team lost" phase at least by then. If you followed this board at all you would know that I don't resort to name calling as a normal response to debate. But, when dealing with certain people (such as trolls) it seems to be the only way to make a point.

oh really?

You mean, really people get over the "ha, ha your team lost" phase by age 10? I know that doesn't apply to you.

If you're talking about name calling, please provide examples of where I have initiated name calling against anyone other than trolls. The archives are all there for you to search. You'll be out of luck.

quicksdraw:

wisblue:

Juiceman:

wisblue:

You are wrong, wrong, wrong, on my age, and anyone who is a regular on this board knows it.

I guessed your age based on the way you respsond to debate.  Name calling is usually left for the immature and uneducated.

I hope for your sake that you are under 10, because usually people get over the "Ha,ha your team lost" phase at least by then. If you followed this board at all you would know that I don't resort to name calling as a normal response to debate. But, when dealing with certain people (such as trolls) it seems to be the only way to make a point.

oh really?

Whining about trolls is a very outdated practice. Its been the backbone of a progressively losing strategy to oust any dissenting opinions that appear "disruptive" to the whiner. Even using the world "troll" is as outdated as your Dungeon Master's Guide from 1983.

Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys?  You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

stix:

You're a piece of s***, scumbag troll, and you're exactly the karmic reason why the Cubs are the biggest losers in sports history.

Their dumb, obnoxious, co**sucking fans.

Go f*** yourself, you pile of s***.

Couldnt have explicated better myself... 

 Cubs fans dont gloat or ever act obnoxiously...

Those W flags are a sign of great sportsmanship

Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys?  You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame.  Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

Base Knox:

Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys?  You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame.  Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

Exactly, I've heard him say multiple times "I'm not a troll like Quicks", yet he acts exactly like a troll, and unlike Quicks adds nothing of any factual value to any debate. He's just another bandwagon cubs fan, and when the chips are down has nothing intelligent to say. 

BenderTheOffender:

Base Knox:

Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys?  You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame.  Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

 

Exactly, I've heard him say multiple times "I'm not a troll like Quicks", yet he acts exactly like a troll, and unlike Quicks adds nothing of any factual value to any debate. He's just another bandwagon cubs fan, and when the chips are down has nothing intelligent to say. 

To you, everyone is a troll who doesn't strictly wear Brewer goggles, provide purely positive propaganda, and unquestionably tow the "company line". Instead of trolls, you guys are the Pixies, who sprinkle pixie dust on everything so that even the Brewer's sh*t sparkles brightly.

Juiceman:

ike1024:

Look at DiFelice's splits.  Learn the game of baseball.

I don't look at splits from some guy who won't be in the league by the end of this year or next.  Bradley had to relearn how to hit lefty this week.  Didn't Macha get the memo?  And if DeFelice can't get a lefty out, why not bring in someone who can?  Where was Coffey?  Or Hoffman?  Oh yeah, Hoffman is a closer and can only come in if the Brewers have the lead.  Looks like he won't get much action this series

Geddy really? Find where I've called someone a "troll" who didn't deserve it. I'm all for differing opinions. I don't think I've ever called you a troll, yet I disagree with a lot of stuff you say. 

Honestly though tell me these statements are not from a troll:

"Cubs are now breathing down Brewers necks.  Not a spot the Crew has responded to well in the last couple of years, has it?"

"Oh yeah, Hoffman is a closer and can only come in if the Brewers have the lead.  Looks like he won't get much action this series"

Also he posts a picture of DiFelice and says Brewers fans are crying... he's just trying to agitate people, it has no value.

Just because someone disagrees with your hyper negative act doesn't mean they don't see that the Brewers have flaws.

 I often complain about Kendall (many times, but you either ignore this or didn't read it), I have wanted Hall off this team/out of the lineup for months,

I have been skeptical of Hardy for a while. Again, just because I don't HATE every thing the Brewers do does not mean I'm ignoring the negative. 

geddymd72:

BenderTheOffender:

Base Knox:

Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys?  You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame.  Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

 

Exactly, I've heard him say multiple times "I'm not a troll like Quicks", yet he acts exactly like a troll, and unlike Quicks adds nothing of any factual value to any debate. He's just another bandwagon cubs fan, and when the chips are down has nothing intelligent to say. 

 

To you, everyone is a troll who doesn't strictly wear Brewer goggles, provide purely positive propaganda, and unquestionably tow the "company line". Instead of trolls, you guys are the Pixies, who sprinkle pixie dust on everything so that even the Brewer's sh*t sparkles brightly.

The funny thing is I think you've posted more positive things on Gwynn Jr. than any Brewer that currently plays on the team. I don't know how far I'd have to search to find something you said positive about a player.

Last thing is, I didn't even call Juiceman a troll, I said he was "acting like a troll". There is a big difference.

 I think you obsess a little too much about finding positive things, because that is all you want to pluck and then weed out anything bad. Plenty of positives about guys like McGehee and Counsell or even Looper and Suppan have been discussed.  The whining about anything "trollish" is getting way too ESPN boardlike.

 Just when I think I can't possibly hate the Cubs or their fans any more, a thread like this pops up. Wow.

And it doesn't surprise me one bit to see Geddy siding with the Cubs fan on this one.