Casey McGehee raised his Average 19 points today. .312 to .331 w/ a 4 hit performance. Very nice. ROY?!

Falling Ardor:

 Casey McGehee raised his Average 19 points today. .312 to .331 w/ a 4 hit performance. Very nice. ROY?!

I think Pablo Sandoval might have a little something to say about that.

Jim Breen:

Falling Ardor:

 Casey McGehee raised his Average 19 points today. .312 to .331 w/ a 4 hit performance. Very nice. ROY?!

 

I think Pablo Sandoval might have a little something to say about that.

Sandoval is ineligible, according to these rules:

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/about_mlb/rules_regulations.jsp

Determining rookie status:
A player shall be considered a rookie unless, during a previous season or seasons, he has (a) exceeded 130 at-bats or 50 innings pitched in the Major Leagues; or (b) accumulated more than 45 days on the active roster of a Major League club or clubs during the period of 25-player limit (excluding time in the military service and time on the disabled list).

Sandoval had 145 ABs last year.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/sandopa01.shtml

(Edited to update link to an official MLB page).

JessieDekan:

Not sure who BA is,

Brian Anderson and  Bill schroeder,   you probably know them by their other monickers  "Bevis & Butthead"

Daubs:

Jim Breen:

Falling Ardor:

 Casey McGehee raised his Average 19 points today. .312 to .331 w/ a 4 hit performance. Very nice. ROY?!

 

I think Pablo Sandoval might have a little something to say about that.

Sandoval is ineligible, according to these rules:

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/about_mlb/rules_regulations.jsp

Determining rookie status:
A player shall be considered a rookie unless, during a previous season or seasons, he has (a) exceeded 130 at-bats or 50 innings pitched in the Major Leagues; or (b) accumulated more than 45 days on the active roster of a Major League club or clubs during the period of 25-player limit (excluding time in the military service and time on the disabled list).

Sandoval had 145 ABs last year.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/sandopa01.shtml

(Edited to update link to an official MLB page).

I stand corrected.  Thanks for the info!

great bounceback game by the crew, i give them credit,  fridays game had to hurt bad.

quicksdraw:

great bounceback game by the crew, i give them credit,  fridays game had to hurt bad.

Anyway, I guess I'm not watching Brewers/Cubs games anymore since the Crew seems to play better that way.  Good win today.

Einsteinhood:

alffan:

Looper hasn't had one cleaning inning Einstein... unless you're watching a different game than I am.

You don't know when to STFU, do you?

StallisTim:

alffan:

What angers me is that everything I say is supposedly stupid or irrational.

Yet, Einstein and StallisTim shoot down anything where I really have a point.

For example, the fact there are 40,000 at Wrigley for a Brewer-Cubs game and about 2,000 Brewer fans.

Yet when the Cubs come north, there are 40,000 at Miller for the same game, there are 15,000 Cub fans.

Where are the Brewer fans to support their team today?

Because I've never seen you have a good point.

The Cubs have a MUCH larger fan base than the Brewers. For that reason, a lot of their fans are unable to get tickets to Wrigley and go to Miller Park instead. Brewer fans don't have that problem, so fewer of them subject themselves to the decaying cesspool that is Wrigley. So there's your reason, now STFU.

I can't believe this keeps coming up, but I guess when the Brewers win 11-2 all alf can complain about is that Brewer fans aren't loyal enough. Usually it's the Cub trolls who bring this up. Maybe we should prepare a pat response to cut and paste every time it does.

Of course, the much larger fanbase, and the geographic dispersion of that fanbase, is the biggest reason. In addition to the Cubs fans who live in Chicago, there are TONS of Cubs fans who live in southeast Wisconsin and near the state line for whom it is a lot easier and less expensive to go to Miller Park than to go to Wrigley Field. For them, Cubs games at Miller Park are like Christmas. They can't wait for the schedule to come out so they can get those tickets. Many Brewer fans and ticket brokers know that, so they buy Brewer season ticket packages that include Cubs games with the idea that they can recoup a high percentage of the cost by reselling the tickets to Cubs fans who will pay top dollar for them. Brewer fans (who are in much smaller numbers) have no such incentive. They can enjoy 75 or so other games at Miller Park without subjecting themselves to the Cub hordes. So, they skip the Cubs games at Miller Park and usually aren't willing to pay the price, both in dollars and inconvenience, to go to Wrigley Field.

If there are 3,000 Brewer fans for a game at Wrigley Field, that's probably a higher percentage of the overall Brewer fanbase than 15,000 Cubs fans is of the Cubs' overall base. So, those raw numbers are not a fair measure of who has more loyal fans. It's as ridiculous as Badger fans who claim they have better basketball fans than Marquette because they draw bigger crowds for their games. They don't seem to understand that UW is a much bigger school and has much bigger student and alumni bases to draw from.

alffan:

Outside of Derrick Lee's two HR's, the Brewers have completely outplayed the Cubs in this series.

Look who pulled his head out of his ass.

JessieDekan:

MateoInMex:

JessieDekan:

 Hey fellas. Just wondering if anyone knows the number to text the booth. Every time Bob or Corey says it, I seem to miss it. Thanks.

If you want to text the TV booth, it's 234234.  It wouldn't make the air, but it would make me happy if it wasn't just me that texts BA for throwing Casey McGeehee out of the ROY running not even half-way through the season.

 

 

 

Thanks, man. I'm usually doing housework (that's what women are for, right?) when I hear the number and never hear the ad for it until it's too late. I'll probably text tomorrow, of course. Not sure who BA is, but I like McGeehee for ROY.

 I do my share of housework too. I apologize. BA are the initials for Brian Anderson, one of two TV commentators for Fox Sports North that cover the Milwaukee Brewers telecasts. I believed he was a huge upgrade over the ex-Brewer telecaster Daron Sutton, but Jessie, I'm sadly mistaken. Brian Anderson is a major jinxing a$$clown.

wisblue:

StallisTim:

alffan:

What angers me is that everything I say is supposedly stupid or irrational.

Yet, Einstein and StallisTim shoot down anything where I really have a point.

For example, the fact there are 40,000 at Wrigley for a Brewer-Cubs game and about 2,000 Brewer fans.

Yet when the Cubs come north, there are 40,000 at Miller for the same game, there are 15,000 Cub fans.

Where are the Brewer fans to support their team today?

Because I've never seen you have a good point.

The Cubs have a MUCH larger fan base than the Brewers. For that reason, a lot of their fans are unable to get tickets to Wrigley and go to Miller Park instead. Brewer fans don't have that problem, so fewer of them subject themselves to the decaying cesspool that is Wrigley. So there's your reason, now STFU.

I can't believe this keeps coming up, but I guess when the Brewers win 11-2 all alf can complain about is that Brewer fans aren't loyal enough. Usually it's the Cub trolls who bring this up. Maybe we should prepare a pat response to cut and paste every time it does.

Of course, the much larger fanbase, and the geographic dispersion of that fanbase, is the biggest reason. In addition to the Cubs fans who live in Chicago, there are TONS of Cubs fans who live in southeast Wisconsin and near the state line for whom it is a lot easier and less expensive to go to Miller Park than to go to Wrigley Field. For them, Cubs games at Miller Park are like Christmas. They can't wait for the schedule to come out so they can get those tickets. Many Brewer fans and ticket brokers know that, so they buy Brewer season ticket packages that include Cubs games with the idea that they can recoup a high percentage of the cost by reselling the tickets to Cubs fans who will pay top dollar for them. Brewer fans (who are in much smaller numbers) have no such incentive. They can enjoy 75 or so other games at Miller Park without subjecting themselves to the Cub hordes. So, they skip the Cubs games at Miller Park and usually aren't willing to pay the price, both in dollars and inconvenience, to go to Wrigley Field.

If there are 3,000 Brewer fans for a game at Wrigley Field, that's probably a higher percentage of the overall Brewer fanbase than 15,000 Cubs fans is of the Cubs' overall base. So, those raw numbers are not a fair measure of who has more loyal fans. It's as ridiculous as Badger fans who claim they have better basketball fans than Marquette because they draw bigger crowds for their games. They don't seem to understand that UW is a much bigger school and has much bigger student and alumni bases to draw from.

This is so right on. The Cubs vs. Brewers fanbases cannot be compared in terms of simple number of bodies. I'd even be willing to bet that if you found a portion of Wisconsin sports fans that were specifically baseball fans, even those fans would be close to 50% / 50% Cubs fans.

The Cubs are the Packers of the MLB in terms of fanbase.

 We're lucky it isn't 80%/20% Cubs/Brewers fans at Miller Park, and a Brewers fan showing of 5-10% at Wrigley should be commended.

quicksdraw:

great bounceback game by the crew, i give them credit,  fridays game had to hurt bad.