Brewers Message Board

Re: Crying about a blown call

StallisTim — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:12:05 GMT

Just when I think I can't possibly hate the Cubs or their fans any more, a thread like this pops up. Wow.

And it doesn't surprise me one bit to see Geddy siding with the Cubs fan on this one.

Re: Crying about a blown call

geddymd72 — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:57:51 GMT

I think you obsess a little too much about finding positive things, because that is all you want to pluck and then weed out anything bad. Plenty of positives about guys like McGehee and Counsell or even Looper and Suppan have been discussed. The whining about anything "trollish" is getting way too ESPN boardlike.

Re: Crying about a blown call

BenderTheOffender — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:45:55 GMT

geddymd72:
BenderTheOffender:
Base Knox:
Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys? You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame. Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

Exactly, I've heard him say multiple times "I'm not a troll like Quicks", yet he acts exactly like a troll, and unlike Quicks adds nothing of any factual value to any debate. He's just another bandwagon cubs fan, and when the chips are down has nothing intelligent to say.

To you, everyone is a troll who doesn't strictly wear Brewer goggles, provide purely positive propaganda, and unquestionably tow the "company line". Instead of trolls, you guys are the Pixies, who sprinkle pixie dust on everything so that even the Brewer's sh*t sparkles brightly.

The funny thing is I think you've posted more positive things on Gwynn Jr. than any Brewer that currently plays on the team. I don't know how far I'd have to search to find something you said positive about a player.

Last thing is, I didn't even call Juiceman a troll, I said he was "acting like a troll". There is a big difference.

Re: Crying about a blown call

BenderTheOffender — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:41:01 GMT

Juiceman:
ike1024:
Look at DiFelice's splits. Learn the game of baseball.
I don't look at splits from some guy who won't be in the league by the end of this year or next. Bradley had to relearn how to hit lefty this week. Didn't Macha get the memo? And if DeFelice can't get a lefty out, why not bring in someone who can? Where was Coffey? Or Hoffman? Oh yeah, Hoffman is a closer and can only come in if the Brewers have the lead. Looks like he won't get much action this series

Geddy really? Find where I've called someone a "troll" who didn't deserve it. I'm all for differing opinions. I don't think I've ever called you a troll, yet I disagree with a lot of stuff you say.

Honestly though tell me these statements are not from a troll:

"Cubs are now breathing down Brewers necks. Not a spot the Crew has responded to well in the last couple of years, has it?"

"Oh yeah, Hoffman is a closer and can only come in if the Brewers have the lead. Looks like he won't get much action this series"

Also he posts a picture of DiFelice and says Brewers fans are crying... he's just trying to agitate people, it has no value.

Just because someone disagrees with your hyper negative act doesn't mean they don't see that the Brewers have flaws.

I often complain about Kendall (many times, but you either ignore this or didn't read it), I have wanted Hall off this team/out of the lineup for months,

I have been skeptical of Hardy for a while. Again, just because I don't HATE every thing the Brewers do does not mean I'm ignoring the negative.

Re: Crying about a blown call

geddymd72 — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:32:46 GMT

BenderTheOffender:
Base Knox:
Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys? You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame. Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

Exactly, I've heard him say multiple times "I'm not a troll like Quicks", yet he acts exactly like a troll, and unlike Quicks adds nothing of any factual value to any debate. He's just another bandwagon cubs fan, and when the chips are down has nothing intelligent to say.

To you, everyone is a troll who doesn't strictly wear Brewer goggles, provide purely positive propaganda, and unquestionably tow the "company line". Instead of trolls, you guys are the Pixies, who sprinkle pixie dust on everything so that even the Brewer's sh*t sparkles brightly.

Re: Crying about a blown call

BenderTheOffender — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:52:25 GMT

Base Knox:
Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys? You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame. Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

Exactly, I've heard him say multiple times "I'm not a troll like Quicks", yet he acts exactly like a troll, and unlike Quicks adds nothing of any factual value to any debate. He's just another bandwagon cubs fan, and when the chips are down has nothing intelligent to say.

Re: Crying about a blown call

Base Knox — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:30:23 GMT

Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys? You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Lame. Real lame...and I'm sure you'll be the first to jump in defending your ilk on the next weekly "Cubs fan mistreatment at Miller Park" thread.

Re: Crying about a blown call

bobby12many — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:35:56 GMT

Cubs fans dont gloat or ever act obnoxiously...

Those W flags are a sign of great sportsmanship

Re: Crying about a blown call

bobby12many — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:34:43 GMT

stix:
You're a piece of s***, scumbag troll, and you're exactly the karmic reason why the Cubs are the biggest losers in sports history.

Their dumb, obnoxious, co**sucking fans.

Go f*** yourself, you pile of s***.

Couldnt have explicated better myself...

Re: Crying about a blown call

Einsteinhood — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:45:06 GMT

Juiceman:

Doesn't that picture kind of sum up you guys? You can almost see the tears coming down his face if you look close enough

Punk ass sonofabitch.

Re: Crying about a blown call

geddymd72 — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:25:02 GMT

quicksdraw:
wisblue:

Juiceman:

wisblue:
You are wrong, wrong, wrong, on my age, and anyone who is a regular on this board knows it.

I guessed your age based on the way you respsond to debate. Name calling is usually left for the immature and uneducated.

I hope for your sake that you are under 10, because usually people get over the "Ha,ha your team lost" phase at least by then. If you followed this board at all you would know that I don't resort to name calling as a normal response to debate. But, when dealing with certain people (such as trolls) it seems to be the only way to make a point.

oh really?

Whining about trolls is a very outdated practice. Its been the backbone of a progressively losing strategy to oust any dissenting opinions that appear "disruptive" to the whiner. Even using the world "troll" is as outdated as your Dungeon Master's Guide from 1983.

Re: Crying about a blown call

wisblue — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:19:27 GMT

quicksdraw:

wisblue:

Juiceman:

wisblue:
You are wrong, wrong, wrong, on my age, and anyone who is a regular on this board knows it.

I guessed your age based on the way you respsond to debate. Name calling is usually left for the immature and uneducated.

I hope for your sake that you are under 10, because usually people get over the "Ha,ha your team lost" phase at least by then. If you followed this board at all you would know that I don't resort to name calling as a normal response to debate. But, when dealing with certain people (such as trolls) it seems to be the only way to make a point.

oh really?

You mean, really people get over the "ha, ha your team lost" phase by age 10? I know that doesn't apply to you.

If you're talking about name calling, please provide examples of where I have initiated name calling against anyone other than trolls. The archives are all there for you to search. You'll be out of luck.

Re: Crying about a blown call

quicksdraw — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:15:45 GMT

wisblue:

Juiceman:

wisblue:
You are wrong, wrong, wrong, on my age, and anyone who is a regular on this board knows it.

I guessed your age based on the way you respsond to debate. Name calling is usually left for the immature and uneducated.

I hope for your sake that you are under 10, because usually people get over the "Ha,ha your team lost" phase at least by then. If you followed this board at all you would know that I don't resort to name calling as a normal response to debate. But, when dealing with certain people (such as trolls) it seems to be the only way to make a point.

oh really?

Re: Crying about a blown call

wisblue — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:14:29 GMT

Juiceman:

wisblue:
You are wrong, wrong, wrong, on my age, and anyone who is a regular on this board knows it.

I guessed your age based on the way you respsond to debate. Name calling is usually left for the immature and uneducated.

I hope for your sake that you are under 10, because usually people get over the "Ha,ha your team lost" phase at least by then. If you followed this board at all you would know that I don't resort to name calling as a normal response to debate. But, when dealing with certain people (such as trolls) it seems to be the only way to make a point.

Re: Crying about a blown call

wisblue — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:10:18 GMT

Juiceman:

wisblue:
I thought you had already proven yourself to be a complete idiot, but you even topped yourself with this incomprehensible drivel.
Brewers fans are going to look at things from the Brewers perspective right? You said so yourself. So if that is your only criteria for gauging the accuracy of an umpire's call, then every umpire's call that goes against the Brewers is going to be seen as incorrect. Isn't that what you are really saying? Because the one pitch that seems to really get your goat this time around happened to go against the Brewers. But you never did reply to the fact DeFelice had nine other pitches to get Fox out, including several 3 and 2 pitches, and didn't. Now come back and tell me how dumb and I am and then reply to my question.

I didn't feel obligated to respond to every one of your idiotic points, but here goes:

1. "your only criteria for gauging the accuracy of an umpire's call, then every umpire's call that goes against the Brewers is going to be seen as incorrect. Isn't that what you are really saying? "

Dead wrong and illogical. What I am saying is that Brewer fans are going to react negatively to questionable or clearly incorrect calls that go against their team, especially when they end the game

2. But you never did reply to the fact DeFelice had nine other pitches to get Fox out, including several 3 and 2 pitches,

What does that have to do with anything? Nobody ever said that the Brewers didn't have many other chances to win the game. You don't seem to be able to separate the debate about the rest of the game to the simple, independent question of whether or not the last pitch of the game should have been called a strike.

3. Now come back and tell me how dumb and I am and then reply to my question.

OK, you asked. You are really dumb if you think that any of the points you have made here are anything other than obnoxious trolling. You are also really dumb if you don't understand that ALL FANS, including fans of your beloved Cubs, are going to debate and complain about things that go against their team, and that they aren't going to be completely neutral and objective about it. You are also really dumb if you think YOU are being objective, and if anyone wants you posting on this forum if your behavior the last day is any indication.

Is that good enough for you?