ace_maverick:

larryktown:

gbmickey01:

The guy had the flu or something and this is news?

You need to understand gravediggercheezefuk's mind Mick. After all, here's a guy whp walks around an airshow in Barafukinboo asking complete strangers there opinion on Brett Favre. Maybe they had a carnival there and cheezefukgravedigger are carnie workers.

Larryktown your insights are spot on. Wcheezer in fact is a pooper scooper for some local County Fairs. He is a professional you know. He even has a professional  1990 S-10 pick-up with his logo on it. :)

"You know a man by the company he keeps."

LKT - you must be so proud.

mickey, the guy flunked a drug test in Feb,, called in sick for his first Queen's set prior to this most recent"flu". He may be the next Demetrius Underwood or; mickey, larry or legionaire'sdisease. Only smarter.

 BTW, what's the Nerdie's problem with Baraboo? GREAT little town imho.

lamboo:

larryktown:

If winning the division last year makes a team "hapless", what would the 6-10 TT led Packers be called?

So a Packer fan flames a Queens rookie on a Packer site - and you flame the Packers...

what should you be called?

As usual you miss the point or try to spin your way around the truth. Regardless of which team you cheer for, mine is the Packers, a poster calling a team that went 10-6 and won the division "hapless" while his team was 6-10 is without a doubt delusional. It appears Lamboo, that you  also are content with poor performance as long as the team is in green and gold.

lamboo:

ace_maverick:

larryktown:

gbmickey01:

The guy had the flu or something and this is news?

You need to understand gravediggercheezefuk's mind Mick. After all, here's a guy whp walks around an airshow in Barafukinboo asking complete strangers there opinion on Brett Favre. Maybe they had a carnival there and cheezefukgravedigger are carnie workers.

Larryktown your insights are spot on. Wcheezer in fact is a pooper scooper for some local County Fairs. He is a professional you know. He even has a professional  1990 S-10 pick-up with his logo on it. :)

"You know a man by the company he keeps."

LKT - you must be so proud.

As must you be also lameboo as gravediggercheezfuk grovel at every word you type.

larryktown:

lamboo:

larryktown:

If winning the division last year makes a team "hapless", what would the 6-10 TT led Packers be called?

So a Packer fan flames a Queens rookie on a Packer site - and you flame the Packers...

what should you be called?

As usual you miss the point or try to spin your way around the truth. Regardless of which team you cheer for, mine is the Packers, a poster calling a team that went 10-6 and won the division "hapless" while his team was 6-10 is without a doubt delusional. It appears Lamboo, that you  also are content with poor performance as long as the team is in green and gold.

larryktown:

As usual you miss the point or try to spin your way around the truth. Regardless of which team you cheer for, mine is the Packers, a poster calling a team that went 10-6 and won the division "hapless" while his team was 6-10 is without a doubt delusional. It appears Lamboo, that you  also are content with poor performance as long as the team is in green and gold.

Well - you got one thing right.

My team will be wearing green and gold, win or lose.

And I might utter a disparaging word RE our division rivals from time to time.

Though it's good to know that you're always at the ready to come to their defense.

Nobody can accuse you of being a "homer".

You might have to provide at least one example of my being "content with poor performance" however. As I don't agree thats the case.

Good luck with that...

lamboo:

larryktown:

As usual you miss the point or try to spin your way around the truth. Regardless of which team you cheer for, mine is the Packers, a poster calling a team that went 10-6 and won the division "hapless" while his team was 6-10 is without a doubt delusional. It appears Lamboo, that you  also are content with poor performance as long as the team is in green and gold.

Well - you got one thing right.

My team will be wearing green and gold, win or lose.

And I might utter a disparaging word RE our division rivals from time to time.

Though it's good to know that you're always at the ready to come to their defense.

Nobody can accuse you of being a "homer".

You might have to provide at least one example of my being "content with poor performance" however. As I don't agree thats the case.

Good luck with that...

 Boo, you know what that's Tater code-speak for:  Since you're not in supporting of firing TT, immediately, you must like the Packers finishing 6-10.

larryktown:

As must you be also lameboo as gravediggercheezfuk grovel at every word you type.

Really? I've disagreed with just about everyone on here from time to time.

And agreed with the likes of Steamer and others on occasion.

Even laughed and played along with our drug addled comic relief Tank.

But I've never found myself on the same side of any discussion with Aceholio...

you 2 make a cute couple.

CheeseCityFan:

Boo, you know what that's Tater code-speak for:  Since you're not in supporting of firing TT, immediately, you must like the Packers finishing 6-10.

I believe you're onto something...

a visceral hatred of all things TT will go a long way to getting you "in da club".

But as Groucho said...

"I wouldn't want to be a part of any club that would have me as a member."

lamboo:

larryktown:

As usual you miss the point or try to spin your way around the truth. Regardless of which team you cheer for, mine is the Packers, a poster calling a team that went 10-6 and won the division "hapless" while his team was 6-10 is without a doubt delusional. It appears Lamboo, that you  also are content with poor performance as long as the team is in green and gold.

Well - you got one thing right.

My team will be wearing green and gold, win or lose.

And I might utter a disparaging word RE our division rivals from time to time.

Though it's good to know that you're always at the ready to come to their defense.

Nobody can accuse you of being a "homer".

You might have to provide at least one example of my being "content with poor performance" however. As I don't agree thats the case.

Good luck with that...

Defending a poster who calls 10-6 "hapless" while the Packers go 6-10 would be a fine example.

larryktown:

Defending a poster who calls 10-6 "hapless" while the Packers go 6-10 would be a fine example.

Talk about "spin"...

physician heal thyself.

tandread84:

larryktown:

lamboo:

larryktown:

If winning the division last year makes a team "hapless", what would the 6-10 TT led Packers be called?

So a Packer fan flames a Queens rookie on a Packer site - and you flame the Packers...

what should you be called?

As usual you miss the point or try to spin your way around the truth. Regardless of which team you cheer for, mine is the Packers, a poster calling a team that went 10-6 and won the division "hapless" while his team was 6-10 is without a doubt delusional. It appears Lamboo, that you  also are content with poor performance as long as the team is in green and gold.

Flamblow, Cheezenuts, and SlaveBidder are all victims of the acceptance of mediocrity that TT brought to GB.

Either that or they are delusional believing that 10-6 is "hapless" after the Pack finishes 6-10. What would 6-10 be was my original point. Notice no response on that from the board geniuses.

lamboo:

larryktown:

Defending a poster who calls 10-6 "hapless" while the Packers go 6-10 would be a fine example.

Talk about "spin"...

physician heal thyself.

Time for you afternoon nap old man. You're having trouble keeping up.

lamboo:

larryktown:

Defending a poster who calls 10-6 "hapless" while the Packers go 6-10 would be a fine example.

Talk about "spin"...

physician heal thyself.

Thread title:

"Another perfect fit for the hapless queens"

Try to keep up,  I am the no spin zone.

larryktown:

lamboo:

larryktown:

Defending a poster who calls 10-6 "hapless" while the Packers go 6-10 would be a fine example.

Talk about "spin"...

physician heal thyself.

Thread title:

"Another perfect fit for the hapless queens"

Try to keep up,  I am the no spin zone.

Hey, lighten up, Larry.  Yes, 6-10 stunk.  But from an historical perspective it is perfectly legit to refer to a franchise heading into its 49th season without a World Championship, a franchise that has been a paper champ many seasons and has logged in such fine showings as a 41-0 loss in a Conference championship game and a last second choke job in the desert to a sub-.500 team to bounce them from the playoffs, as hapless, regardless of where they finish vis a vis the Packers.

If you fail to see the reasoning behind that argument, just order your purple #4 jersey now and end the suspense, OK?