World Serious Thread....

Last post 11-05-2009 9:27 PM by klwillis45. 130 replies.
Page 3 of 9 (131 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 10-29-2009 3:28 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    badger80:

    sidney lanier:

    badger80:

    Are there any commissioners that were really any good, or are they all just money grubbers who, at best, just happened to let a social revolution happen on their watch?

    This one wasn't bad. He may have been a little hard on the Shoeless, but he carved out a role for the commissioner to act in the best interests of the game independent of the owners that it took Bud and the boys about 75 years to undo.

    Was segregation in the best interest of the game?

     

    Was segregation in the best interests of the country?

    Because baseball led the way in regards to integration.

  • 10-29-2009 4:03 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    brewguru:

    badger80:

    sidney lanier:

    badger80:

    Are there any commissioners that were really any good, or are they all just money grubbers who, at best, just happened to let a social revolution happen on their watch?


    This one wasn't bad. He may have been a little hard on the Shoeless, but he carved out a role for the commissioner to act in the best interests of the game independent of the owners that it took Bud and the boys about 75 years to undo.

    Was segregation in the best interest of the game?

     

    Was segregation in the best interests of the country?

    Because baseball led the way in regards to integration.

    Baseball may have led the way, but it was after Landis was gone.

    I'm just saying that we need to consider a person's whole body of work.

    Baseball is a game of the long season, of relentless and gradual averaging-out. Irrelevance—since the reference point of most individual games is remote and statistical—always threatens its interest, which can be maintained not by the occasional heroics that sportswriters feed upon but by players who always care; who care, that is to say, about themselves and their art. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, he is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.

  • 10-29-2009 4:09 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    How can you have a $200+ million payroll and have Swisher, Melky, and Damon as your outfielders?

  • 10-29-2009 4:14 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    badger80:

    brewguru:

    badger80:

    sidney lanier:

    badger80:

    Are there any commissioners that were really any good, or are they all just money grubbers who, at best, just happened to let a social revolution happen on their watch?


    This one wasn't bad. He may have been a little hard on the Shoeless, but he carved out a role for the commissioner to act in the best interests of the game independent of the owners that it took Bud and the boys about 75 years to undo.

    Was segregation in the best interest of the game?

     

    Was segregation in the best interests of the country?

    Because baseball led the way in regards to integration.

    Baseball may have led the way, but it was after Landis was gone.

    I'm just saying that we need to consider a person's whole body of work.

     

    I'm just saying that baseball gets ripped for segregation when the United States was that way and for 20 years later. There were still drinking fountains for whites and coloreds in the south in the early 60s.

  • 10-29-2009 4:17 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    brewguru:

    badger80:

    brewguru:

    badger80:

    sidney lanier:

    badger80:

    Are there any commissioners that were really any good, or are they all just money grubbers who, at best, just happened to let a social revolution happen on their watch?


    This one wasn't bad. He may have been a little hard on the Shoeless, but he carved out a role for the commissioner to act in the best interests of the game independent of the owners that it took Bud and the boys about 75 years to undo.

    Was segregation in the best interest of the game?

     

    Was segregation in the best interests of the country?

    Because baseball led the way in regards to integration.

    Baseball may have led the way, but it was after Landis was gone.

    I'm just saying that we need to consider a person's whole body of work.

     

    I'm just saying that baseball gets ripped for segregation when the United States was that way and for 20 years later. There were still drinking fountains for whites and coloreds in the south in the early 60s.

    I agree and I'm not ripping baseball.  Sidney was holding Landis up as a great baseball commissioner and I was just pointing out that he had some major flaws.
    Baseball is a game of the long season, of relentless and gradual averaging-out. Irrelevance—since the reference point of most individual games is remote and statistical—always threatens its interest, which can be maintained not by the occasional heroics that sportswriters feed upon but by players who always care; who care, that is to say, about themselves and their art. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, he is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.

  • 10-29-2009 4:35 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    badger80:

    brewguru:

    badger80:

    brewguru:

    badger80:

    sidney lanier:

    badger80:

    Are there any commissioners that were really any good, or are they all just money grubbers who, at best, just happened to let a social revolution happen on their watch?


    This one wasn't bad. He may have been a little hard on the Shoeless, but he carved out a role for the commissioner to act in the best interests of the game independent of the owners that it took Bud and the boys about 75 years to undo.

    Was segregation in the best interest of the game?

     

    Was segregation in the best interests of the country?

    Because baseball led the way in regards to integration.

    Baseball may have led the way, but it was after Landis was gone.

    I'm just saying that we need to consider a person's whole body of work.

     

    I'm just saying that baseball gets ripped for segregation when the United States was that way and for 20 years later. There were still drinking fountains for whites and coloreds in the south in the early 60s.

    I agree and I'm not ripping baseball.  Sidney was holding Landis up as a great baseball commissioner and I was just pointing out that he had some major flaws.

     

    Ah, ok then.

     

    Carry on. :)

  • 10-29-2009 7:51 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    Landis stood directly and repeatedly in the way of integration. There were surveys of players that came out that said they weren't opposed, he didn't budge. The negro leagues had success, he doesn't budge. MLB needs to attract new patrons in the depression, he doesn't budge.

    The guy may not have been worse than other men of his generation on stuff like this, but he certainly wasn't any better.

    Proud member of the Clueless Moron HOF.

  • 10-29-2009 8:23 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

     I think that pick off in the top of the fourth gave NY new life. The crowd certainly seemed to wake up after that...and then Tex goes yard. If NY ends up winning this game, I think that pick off might be seen as a turning point.

  • 10-29-2009 8:26 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    crichar3:

     I think that pick off in the top of the fourth gave NY new life. The crowd certainly seemed to wake up after that...and then Tex goes yard. If NY ends up winning this game, I think that pick off might be seen as a turning point.

    Seemed like it.

    How did Philly score?

    Proud member of the Clueless Moron HOF.

  • 10-29-2009 8:28 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    badger80:

    crichar3:

    Einsteinhood:
    Happy Chandler, the guy who got out of Branch Rickey's way on integration after Landis stood in the way for years?
     

    Opening the game to black players was huge, but if his greatest contribution to the game was the passive act of "getting out of the way" then I would suggest this single "action" falls short of what I think the HoF should be about.

    I understand what you're saying, but someone had to take the initiative to do it, and the move wasn't going to be greeted with a shrug by the general public.


     

     

    Point taken. But does that act alone merit inclusion in the HoF? I don't think so. I think it should chiefly be a place for on-the-field actors. (Insert your Chuck Connors joke here...)

     

    badger80:
    Are there any commissioners that were really any good, or are they all just money grubbers who, at best, just happened to let a social revolution happen on their watch?
     

     

    I don't know if they were all soul-less money grubbers, but I am still at a loss to think of one who merits inclusion.

     

     

  • 10-29-2009 8:31 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

     

    Einsteinhood:
    How did Philly score?

    I was just going to reply, but I see they just recapped the Stairs RBI on TV.

  • 10-29-2009 9:31 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    Nice, Jeter

    To be proven wrong should be celebrated for it is elevating someone to a new level of understanding and awareness
  • 10-29-2009 9:56 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    Mariano Rivera might be the best relief pitcher of all time.

    To be proven wrong should be celebrated for it is elevating someone to a new level of understanding and awareness
  • 10-29-2009 10:24 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    willie key:

    Mariano Rivera might be is the best relief pitcher of all time.

    fixed.

    ;-)
    Proud member of the Clueless Moron HOF.

  • 10-29-2009 10:27 PM In reply to

    Re: World Serious Thread....

    Einsteinhood:

    willie key:

    Mariano Rivera might be is the best relief pitcher of all time.

    fixed.

    ;-)

    Thank U

    To be proven wrong should be celebrated for it is elevating someone to a new level of understanding and awareness
Page 3 of 9 (131 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »