USC lost to an unranked Washington and got destroyed by Oregon and they still carry a #12 ranking.  LOL.

Here's a quote I just heard from Pete Carroll on College Gameday regarding Oregon.

"They played faster than we wanted them to."

LOL.  

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

kegman:

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

LOL.  No love to the Guru for calling another overrated team.  This for the guy who predicted UW winning 10 games before the year started.

kegman:

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

USC's NFL defense didn't look too NFL today.

CollegeFootballGuru:

kegman:

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

 

LOL.  No love to the Guru for calling another overrated team.  This for the guy who predicted UW winning 10 games before the year started.

If I could figure out how to post pictures, I'd post the pictures of my worn out wieners in their Badgers jerseys after the beat little blue crazyness.

kegman:

CollegeFootballGuru:

kegman:

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

 

LOL.  No love to the Guru for calling another overrated team.  This for the guy who predicted UW winning 10 games before the year started.

If I could figure out how to post pictures, I'd post the pictures of my worn out wieners in their Badgers jerseys after the beat little blue crazyness.

LOL.

+1

kegman:

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

Washington isn't underrated.  They beat USC, but can a 3-7 team be underrated?

USC's troubles might just help Wisconsin move up the pecking order.  Doubtful that the Pac 10 gets 2 BCS bids now.  A 2 loss Big Ten team (Iowa/Penn St) might just get an Orange or Fiesta invite.

thebiga:

kegman:

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

Washington isn't underrated.  They beat USC, but can a 3-7 team be underrated?

USC's troubles might just help Wisconsin move up the pecking order.  Doubtful that the Pac 10 gets 2 BCS bids now.  A 2 loss Big Ten team (Iowa/Penn St) might just get an Orange or Fiesta invite.

Maybe, I'm thinkng they will go with both TCU and Boise, they should at least.  The MWC deserves an automatic bid, that conference is no joke, at least top 4 aren't.

nezy37:

Maybe, I'm thinkng they will go with both TCU and Boise, they should at least.  The MWC deserves an automatic bid, that conference is no joke, at least top 4 aren't.

Agreed but it's unlikely at best that they pick both TCU and Boise for at larges.  They only have to pick one non BCS qualifier so that's all they'll probably pick.  Remember, this isn't about should do or fairness, it's about money.  Penn St, for example, will sell more tickets and bring more tv eyes than Boise St.

kegman:

Wrong again Guru, Washington, Oregon and Stanford are underrated.

we will see about oregon.  They finish the season AT Arizona and At #18 Oregon St.

thebiga:

nezy37:

Maybe, I'm thinkng they will go with both TCU and Boise, they should at least.  The MWC deserves an automatic bid, that conference is no joke, at least top 4 aren't.

Agreed but it's unlikely at best that they pick both TCU and Boise for at larges.  They only have to pick one non BCS qualifier so that's all they'll probably pick.  Remember, this isn't about should do or fairness, it's about money.  Penn St, for example, will sell more tickets and bring more tv eyes than Boise St.

No question, you are probably right.  I just don't see any way in hell the Bigten is deserving of two BCS teams.

 I'd give the other to either the loser of the ACC title game which would be either Ga. tech or Va tech or the second place Pac10 team.

 The Pac10 is really deep this year, I've been watching quite a bit of their games and other than Washington St. no one sucks.

nezy37:

No question, you are probably right.  I just don't see any way in hell the Bigten is deserving of two BCS teams.

 I'd give the other to either the loser of the ACC title game which would be either Ga. tech or Va tech or the second place Pac10 team.

 The Pac10 is really deep this year, I've been watching quite a bit of their games and other than Washington St. no one sucks.

Ga Tech, if they don't qualify automatically will be in the at large discussion.  FWIW, VT won't play in the ACC title game.  GT and VT are in the same division.  Clemson and BC are duking it out to play GT.  If either of them lose to GT, they'll have 4 losses.  No way you get an at large with 4 losses.

Also no way VT or the 2nd place Pac 10 team (esp if its Oregon) will go to the BCS.  All will have at least 3 losses.  I doubt a 3 loss ACC or Pac10 team is more deserving over a 2 loss Penn St or Iowa team, at least in the eyes of the bowls.  The Orange, Sugar and Fiesta would love to get Penn St and their mass traveling base.

what about cincy???

thebiga:

nezy37:

No question, you are probably right.  I just don't see any way in hell the Bigten is deserving of two BCS teams.

 I'd give the other to either the loser of the ACC title game which would be either Ga. tech or Va tech or the second place Pac10 team.

 The Pac10 is really deep this year, I've been watching quite a bit of their games and other than Washington St. no one sucks.

Ga Tech, if they don't qualify automatically will be in the at large discussion.  FWIW, VT won't play in the ACC title game.  GT and VT are in the same division.  Clemson and BC are duking it out to play GT.  If either of them lose to GT, they'll have 4 losses.  No way you get an at large with 4 losses.

Also no way VT or the 2nd place Pac 10 team (esp if its Oregon) will go to the BCS.  All will have at least 3 losses.  I doubt a 3 loss ACC or Pac10 team is more deserving over a 2 loss Penn St or Iowa team, at least in the eyes of the bowls.  The Orange, Sugar and Fiesta would love to get Penn St and their mass traveling base.

And all teams must have 9 wins....

runningwithscissors:

what about cincy???

What about them?  I expect them to get the Big East automatic bid.